-
The federal lawsuit claims the law violates Disney's right to free speech, breaks statutory obligations and could leave taxpayers on the hook for a billion dollars or more of Reedy Creek debt.
-
It follows a ruling last year that the law violated the First Amendment.
-
It will address a law that prohibits social media companies from banning political candidates’ accounts.
-
Activist Chaz Stevens says the book isn't age appropriate and contains references to rape and bestiality. It's a not-so-subtle dig at Florida's recent efforts to ban books.
-
The House Judiciary Committee voted along party lines to approve the bill, with some changes. A Senate committee will consider a companion bill.
-
The federal judge said the university had blatantly violated the Constitution and described the university’s legal defenses as “shocking.”
-
He addressed the UF lawyer's claim of "newly discovered facts" that showed the professors had already begun working on the elections case before their requests to serve as witnesses were rejected.
-
Chief U.S. District Judge Mark Walker held a fiery hearing Friday on the plaintiffs’ request to block the university from enforcing a policy that drew national attention after three political science professors were blocked from testifying in an elections law case.
-
From the coronavirus pandemic, standardized testing schools and the environment, here are some issues that the legislature will take up this year.
-
In the lawsuit, the professors claimed university officials told them that going against the executive branch of the government was “adverse” to the school’s interests.
-
They range from Florida's law cracking down on protests to whether sports betting will be allowed in the state.
-
The professors filed the lawsuit after the university denied their requests to serve as plaintiffs’ witnesses in a challenge to a new state elections law.